Radiometric dating not reliable common internet dating questions

Rated 3.86/5 based on 960 customer reviews

A further example from a lava flow off the coast of Hawaii shows similar discrepancies.If dated with the carbon-14 method, the flow appears to be less than 17,000 years old, but dating with the potassium argon method gives dates of 160,000 to 43 million years.Radiometric dating techniques are thus based on sound scientific principles, but rely on so many basic assumptions that Bible believers need not have their faith shattered by data derived from these techniques. What do rock layers on the Earth's crust tell us about our origins and the age of the earth? We could put forward the following counter arguments to the constancy of these assumptions: a) The constancy of cosmic ray bombardment might be questioned.The current high rate of entry might be a consequence of a disturbed post-Flood environment that altered the .

radiometric dating not reliable-22

radiometric dating not reliable-38

By dating rocks of known ages which give highly inflated ages, geologists have shown this method can’t give reliable absolute ages.A rock sample from Nigeria was dated at 95 million years by the potassium-argon method, 750 million years by the uranium-helium method, and less than 30 million years by the fission-track method.If the clock is not set to zero when a deposit forms, then there can be no starting point from which to calculate the age of a deposit.It is assumed that we are dealing with a closed system—no loss of either parent or daughter elements has occurred since the study material formed.No scientist can guarantee that any sample can be considered a closed system unless it was isolated from its environment when it was formed.

Leave a Reply